![\"Master](\"http:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File%3AMaster_Yoda_-_origami.jpg\")
<\/a>The sequence of words important is, yes!<\/p><\/div>
\nDanish\u00a0grammar has a tiny detail that always gives away foreigners: Inversion. That basically means that in some situations you have to change the word order, and if you forget to do that in those situations, well, then you sound like a foreigner\u2026 \ud83d\ude42<\/p>\n
There’s inversion in English too. To make a phrase like “you are happy” into a question, you simply make the subject and the verb switch places: Are you happy? (With other verbs than “to be” it gets more complicated, but let’s leave that for now.) As you know, Danish\u00a0make questions in the same way: Du er glad<\/b> > Er du glad<\/b>?<\/p>\n
Let’s make that last example negative: Du er ikke glad<\/b> (You are not happy) > Er du ikke glad<\/b>? (Are you not happy?) Once again, Danish\u00a0and English are like two peas in a pod.<\/p>\n
Okay, let’s turn our example into a dependent clause:<\/p>\n
Du siger at du er glad.<\/b> (You say that you are happy. \u2013 As you maybe remember from school, a dependent clause is part of a main clause. “that you are happy” cannot stand on its own. Note that the Danish phrase can also be written with a comma after “siger”: Du siger, at du er glad.<\/em>)<\/p>\n And the negative one:<\/p>\n Du siger at du ikke<\/span> er glad.<\/b> (You say that you are not<\/span> happy.)<\/p>\n Finally we see the difference between the two languages. In Danish, the word “ikke” does a backwards summersault and places itself in front of<\/i> the verb in dependent clauses: Du er <\/b>ikke<\/b>\u2026<\/b> > Du siger at du <\/b>ikke<\/b> er\u2026<\/b><\/p>\n The same goes for other words of the same kind, that is, adverbs<\/i> that somehow influence the meaning of the whole sentence, such as tit<\/strong>\u00a0<\/b>(often), aldrig\u00a0<\/b>(never), altid<\/b> (always), bare<\/b> (just):<\/p>\n Han tager\u00a0tit<\/span>\u00a0til Fyn. <\/b>(He often goes to Funen.) > Jeg har h\u00f8rt at han tit<\/span>\u00a0tager\u00a0til Fyn.<\/b> (I’ve heard that he often goes to Funen.)<\/p>\n Hun s\u00e5 bare<\/span>\u00a0tr\u00e6t ud<\/b>. <\/b>(She just looked tired.) > Det er hende der bare<\/span> s\u00e5 tr\u00e6t ud<\/b>. <\/b>(It’s she\u00a0that just looked tired.)<\/p>\n Du ringer <\/b>aldrig<\/b><\/span>. <\/b>(You never call.) > Jeg forst\u00e5r ikke hvorfor du <\/b>aldrig<\/b><\/span> ringer.<\/b> (I don’t understand why you never call.)<\/p>\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Danish\u00a0grammar has a tiny detail that always gives away foreigners: Inversion. That basically means that in some situations you have to change the word order, and if you forget to do that in those situations, well, then you sound like a foreigner\u2026 \ud83d\ude42 There’s inversion in English too. To make a phrase like “you are…<\/p>\n