![\"Negerzoen](\"https:\/\/blogs.transparent.com\/dutch\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/11\/2016\/06\/Negerzoen.jpg\")
<\/a>Buys Zoenen<\/em><\/p><\/div>\n What is controversial about them? In the Netherlands and Germany, they are known as\u00a0Negerzoenen\u00a0<\/em>or\u00a0Negerk\u00fcsse<\/em>, which literally translates to “Nigger Kisses” or “Negro Kisses”. The treat came originally from Denmark, around 200 years ago, and spread from there to the rest of Europe. The modern \u00a0and in many countries an equivalent term was used. Not always though: in Austria, for example, they are known as Schwedenbomben\u00a0<\/em>(Swedish Bombs). Obviously, 200 years ago, there was not much controversy about the “N-word”. Especially not in Europe. Even today, the sensitivity that is associated with the word in the United States is in no way comparable to Europe.<\/p>\n The reason for this sensitivity in the United States is historical; much like the holocaust and Nazi Germany is sensitive in Europe, and much less sensitive in the United States.<\/p>\n The name was changed in France and Germany anyway, and an interests organization sent a letter to\u00a0Buys<\/em> to also consider changing the name. This would explain\u00a0why only 10 years ago in 2006, the main and oldest manufacturer of these treats in the Netherlands, Banketbakkerij Buys\u00a0<\/em>(confectioner Buys) simply changed the name of their product to\u00a0Zoenen\u00a0<\/em>(Kisses). But some people contest that, and say that it was just a marketing stunt of Buys <\/em>so they\u00a0would get attention for their product.\u00a0<\/em>Changing the name itself\u00a0was also met with controversy, much like the\u00a0Zwarte Pietendebat<\/a>\u00a0<\/em>in recent years:\u00a0it is ridiculous to change the name, because “it has always been called that way”, they think.<\/p>\n But why were they called this way? Where did that name come from?<\/p>\n One\u00a0Buys\u00a0<\/em>spokesperson said this: “Iemand die een negerzoen eet, krijgt bruine lippen en als die een ander een kus geeft, is dat een kus van een neger. Maar dat weet ik alleen uit de overlevering.<\/em>” (Somebody that eats a negro kiss, gets bwon lips and if that person gives another a kiss, then that is the kiss of a negro. But I only know that from lore.)<\/p>\n The German manufacturer\u00a0Dickmann’s\u00a0has a different explanation\u00a0<\/em>(Dickmann’s could\u00a0be a controversial name too. Literally “Fat Man’s”. It is the name of the founder, though!). \u00a0The modern kind that they make \u2013 the same kind made\u00a0in the Netherlands \u2013 is from France. The whipped egg-white cream in the\u00a0Zoen<\/em> is also called\u00a0Baiser<\/em>, which is from France. And in French,\u00a0baiser\u00a0<\/em>also means “to kiss”. So from there, they took the name Kuss. Since it was dipped in chocolate, one could have also called it\u00a0Schokokuss\u00a0<\/em>(German for “Chocolate Kiss”, as they call it today), but, as\u00a0Dickmann’s\u00a0<\/em>explains, the color reminded of black people, and so they called them\u00a0Negerkuss<\/em>.<\/p>\n Ever since they changed it, people started refraining from using the word\u00a0negerzoen<\/em>. When I bought a package the other day, the\u00a0kassamedewerkster\u00a0<\/em>(cashier) also “accidentally” said\u00a0negerzoen\u00a0<\/em>(it was actually one of the\u00a0<\/em>packages of\u00a0Buys Zoenen<\/em>!). She then quickly added:\u00a0“Oh ja, dat mag niet meer!<\/em>” (Oh right, that is not allowed anymore!) But legally, you can still say\u00a0negerzoenen<\/em>, it is just not really politically correct…<\/p>\n <\/p>\n What do you think, is\u00a0negerzoen\u00a0<\/em>an acceptable name? Or was the name change a good idea? Let me know in the comments, or shoot me a message on Facebook!<\/p>\nNegerzoen\u00a0<\/strong><\/em>and its origins<\/strong><\/h3>\n
Change of name<\/strong><\/h3>\n
Origin of the name\u00a0<\/strong><\/h3>\n
Het mag niet meer!<\/em><\/strong><\/h3>\n