![\"learning](\"https:\/\/blogs.transparent.com\/language-news\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/28\/2013\/03\/laptop-3289261_960_720.jpg\")
<\/p>\nIf I want to learn a second language, can I turn to my computer? One would hope so, since I make such products for a living. And the answer is yes… but it\u2019s a qualified yes.<\/p>\n
I can\u2019t learn another language the way I learned my native language without moving to another country or investing a lot of time and money into a total immersion classroom experience.<\/p>\n
So why can\u2019t I learn a language in the same, \u201cnatural\u201d way I learned English using software? Try prying apart your first language.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
A company friend from Brazil came up to Transparent Language for a visit, occupying an empty desk by the Product Management team. He speaks English very well, but as you know, you never really finish learning a language. On the last day of his visit he posited a question: \u201cWhat\u2019s the difference between a cup, a glass, and a mug?\u201d<\/p>\n
I started to blurt out an answer then halted. Everything I\u2019d just said was, at best, half-right. Pretty soon I found myself making a table in Excel that cross-referenced material, tallness, and presence of a handle on drinking implements. I was shocked at how complicated this was.<\/p>\n
As a native English speaker, I don\u2019t have any trouble referring to drinkware on a daily basis; I can\u2019t remember the last time I struggled over what to call a mug, glass, or cup. I could look at such objects all day and tell you what to call each one. But when it comes to writing down the rules to give to a non-native speaker as reference, well… turns out it\u2019s actually pretty hard.<\/a><\/p>\n This is the kind of thing that happens with a first language\u2014the language(s) one acquires naturally while growing up: its rules become embedded in the memory without justification. The what<\/em> gets stored without requiring the why<\/em>.<\/strong> Someone who speaks English very well might have a huge problem explaining the definition of an adverb. Just so, the difference between a cup, glass, or mug doesn\u2019t exist as an explicit rule; it just emerges from a jumble of learned rules. The kind of memory that stores these rules is called procedural memory.<\/p>\n Procedural memory is really, really difficult to teach with software. Take a look at the list of definitions I ended up making for Adir:<\/p>\n Even now I can spot exceptions in my logic, and I\u2019ve been speaking English my whole life.<\/p>\n By making that list I transformed my procedural knowledge of English terms for cups, mugs, and glasses into declarative knowledge. Declarative knowledge, to oversimplify, is taught knowledge. I had to teach myself the rules of what\u2019s what in a way that I could point to as clear definitions. But those rules were hard to make because I had to draw boundaries around amorphous puddles in my subconscious.<\/p>\n People learning languages \u201cnaturally,\u201d through immersion, don\u2019t learn declaratively (consciously taught); they learn procedurally (subconsciously picked-up). A well-designed app or website can very effectively build your declarative knowledge, but not procedural knowledge. In fact, it has no choice. So any company that promises to teach you language the way you learned it as a child is exaggerating.<\/p>\n The short answer is yes. You can effectively build your language proficiency by building your declarative knowledge.<\/strong> Transparent Language designs its platforms to streamline declarative learning; it focuses on drilling words, phrases, and concepts into your long-term memory.<\/p>\n Stuffing words and phrases in your brain may not seem like it\u2019s going to be very productive\u2014who wants to say simply \u201cbathroom\u201d when you could be saying \u201cExcuse me, I was wondering, if it\u2019s not too much trouble, where I might find the lavatory?\u201d\u2014but the reality is, learning words and phrases first is productive as they say around here. In fact, studies show that vocabulary size is by far the greatest contributor to language proficiency<\/a>, accounting for anywhere from 50% to 70% of proficiency gains depending on the language and the skill being studied.<\/strong>\u00a0If you read Barcroft\u2019s five principles of of effective second language vocabulary instruction<\/a>, you\u2019ll see that repeated exposure to sets of words and phrases is extremely necessary. His third principle says it\u2019s even counterproductive to make learners start forming sentences too early.<\/p>\n So the moral of the story is, change your expectations. Don\u2019t expect to pick up a second language the same way you picked up the first if you\u2019re using technology as your main learning tool. Instead, focus on learning as many words and phrases as you can. Fill your declarative memory. That\u2019s what we\u2019ve designed our platforms to do.<\/a><\/p>\n Will you pick up some procedural knowledge along the way? Yes. Should you use other tools (books, videos, conversation partners, formal classes, etc.)? Absolutely.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" If I want to learn a second language, can I turn to my computer? One would hope so, since I make such products for a living. And the answer is yes… but it\u2019s a qualified yes. I can\u2019t learn another language the way I learned my native language without moving to another country or investing…<\/p>\nOnline courses alone won’t build your procedural knowledge.<\/h5>\n
\n
So… can someone learn a language with technology or not?<\/h5>\n
![\"learning](\"https:\/\/blogs.transparent.com\/language-news\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/28\/2013\/03\/laptop-3289261_960_720-350x243.jpg\")