Direct Object of the Second Declension Posted by kunthra on Apr 16, 2010 in Latin Language
The direct object of the second declension will have a different ending from the direct object of the first declension. That’s why Latin can be so challenging.
The singular accusative (direct object) of the second declension will have a -um ending
Cervus campum dēlet. (dēlēre = to destroy. campus = camp, field)
Since “campum” ends in -um, you can guess that this is the direct object. So “cervus” must be the nominative. Hence, the sentence will mean “The deer is destroying the field/camp” .
The plural accusative of the second declension will end in -ōs
Cervus campōs dēlet.
This time, “campōs” ends in -ōs not -um. This is because “campōs” is in the plural. As a result, the sentence will have the meaning, “The deer is destroying the fields/camps”.
Now try translating these sentences :
(1) Magistrī librōs habent. (liber = book. magister = teacher. habēre = to have)
(2) Virum amāmus.
(3) Deum nōn parētis. (pārēre = to obey. deus = god)
Here are the answers :
(1) The teachers have books.
(2) We love the man.
(3) You all are not obeying the god.
Build vocabulary, practice pronunciation, and more with Transparent Language Online. Available anytime, anywhere, on any device.